How We Review Exchanges
Our review methodology in full: the six criteria, how they are scored, what is deliberately excluded, and exactly how affiliate income is kept out of the scoring.
Last updated: 2026-09-01
The short version
We score exchanges on six criteria, each 0–5, against evidence the exchange itself publishes. Commission, payout rate and partnership tier are not criteria, are not inputs to the score, and are not arguments to the scoring function in the code.
No exchange appears on this site — with or without a referral link — until its record has been filled in, checked against primary sources, dated, and marked verified.
The six criteria
| Criterion | What is assessed | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Fee transparency | Is the full schedule published, current and legible, including tiers? | The venue's own fee page |
| Security practices | Published policy, audits, bounty programme, incident disclosures | The venue's security pages and post-incident reports |
| Regulatory disclosure | Registrations the venue publishes, checkable against the register | Regulator registers |
| Education quality | Is the venue's own educational material substantive and free of promotion? | The venue's learn section |
| Learner usability | Order types, demo mode, clarity for a first-time user | Direct examination of the platform |
| Support transparency | Published channels, hours and response commitments | The venue's support pages |
The overall score is the mean of the six, expressed out of 100. There is no weighting, because weighting is where a thumb goes on a scale.
What is deliberately excluded
Commission and partnership terms. Excluded structurally, not by policy alone: the scoring function takes only the six criteria as arguments, so commercial terms cannot enter it without a visible code change.
Bonuses and promotions. Sign-up offers are marketing, they change constantly, and they are the least relevant factor in whether a venue suits you.
Volume and popularity rankings. Size is not quality, and volume figures are difficult to verify independently.
Price predictions, coin lists and "best coin to buy" content. Out of scope for this site entirely.
How money reaches this site
Some links to exchanges are referral links. If you open an account through one, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you. Where that applies, it is disclosed next to the link itself, not only in the footer.
Three safeguards:
- Commission is not a scoring input. See above.
- A record with no verified referral link still gets reviewed and published. The absence of a commercial relationship does not remove a venue from the site.
- No call to action renders for an unverified record. If a record is not marked verified and its referral URL is not present, no link is shown — not a disabled one, not a placeholder. The gate is enforced in one function that every call to action passes through.
Full detail in the affiliate disclosure.
Verification and re-checking
Every record carries a verification date and the list of source URLs it was checked against. Both are shown on the review page.
Records are re-checked on a scheduled cadence. When a re-check changes a score, the change and its reason are recorded. When we get something wrong, we correct it under the correction policy — dated, and saying what changed.
What a review is not
It is not a recommendation, and it is not personal advice. A high score means a venue publishes more checkable information than a low-scoring one. It says nothing about whether trading there — or trading at all — is appropriate for you.
Current state of this installation
This build ships with placeholder records only. No real exchange has been reviewed, no referral relationship exists, and no referral link is published. Every record shows its placeholder status openly.
